<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can You Tweet Securely?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thegarlandgroup.net/2010/03/01/tweet-securely/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thegarlandgroup.net/2010/03/01/tweet-securely/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natasha</title>
		<link>http://www.thegarlandgroup.net/2010/03/01/tweet-securely/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Natasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 08:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegarlandgroup.net/?p=1499#comment-368</guid>
		<description>Indeed Craig @ClearRisk ! Policies without enforcing makes for quite a dusty policy!  I have seen quite a few twitter invitations in my email &quot;Your friend has invited you to twitter&quot;. Call me paranoid but I refuse to find out if they are legitimate!  Keep it simple....just add me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed Craig @ClearRisk ! Policies without enforcing makes for quite a dusty policy!  I have seen quite a few twitter invitations in my email &#8220;Your friend has invited you to twitter&#8221;. Call me paranoid but I refuse to find out if they are legitimate!  Keep it simple&#8230;.just add me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natasha</title>
		<link>http://www.thegarlandgroup.net/2010/03/01/tweet-securely/comment-page-1/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>Natasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 00:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegarlandgroup.net/?p=1499#comment-361</guid>
		<description>Indeed Craig @ClearRisk ! Policies without enforcing makes for quite a dusty policy!  I have seen quite a few twitter invitations in my email &quot;Your friend has invited you to twitter&quot;. Call me paranoid but I refuse to find out if they are legitimate!  Keep it simple....just add me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed Craig @ClearRisk ! Policies without enforcing makes for quite a dusty policy!  I have seen quite a few twitter invitations in my email &#8220;Your friend has invited you to twitter&#8221;. Call me paranoid but I refuse to find out if they are legitimate!  Keep it simple&#8230;.just add me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craigrowe</title>
		<link>http://www.thegarlandgroup.net/2010/03/01/tweet-securely/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>craigrowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegarlandgroup.net/?p=1499#comment-359</guid>
		<description>Excellent post, Eric.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You make a valid point that when a user &quot;reacts&quot; to a security breach, it is simply that, a reaction. It is much better to be proactive than reactive, as you outline in your post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is interesting to note that Twitter&#039;s internal security controls were not as tight as they should be, and that is a great lesson for any business using the service. While it is a great idea to establish those guidelines you mention, it is even more important to share those guidelines through policymaking and enforcing them regularly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just because one person is prudent about online information doesn&#039;t mean that somebody else will be! Any marketing initiatives that place another employee at the controls of a personal or business Twitter account should have a Security Policy in place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post, Eric.</p>
<p>You make a valid point that when a user &#8220;reacts&#8221; to a security breach, it is simply that, a reaction. It is much better to be proactive than reactive, as you outline in your post.</p>
<p>It is interesting to note that Twitter&#39;s internal security controls were not as tight as they should be, and that is a great lesson for any business using the service. While it is a great idea to establish those guidelines you mention, it is even more important to share those guidelines through policymaking and enforcing them regularly.</p>
<p>Just because one person is prudent about online information doesn&#39;t mean that somebody else will be! Any marketing initiatives that place another employee at the controls of a personal or business Twitter account should have a Security Policy in place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

